And if you can't access the link, here's the full text of the article:
Ban On Fast Food TV Advertising Would Reverse Childhood Obesity Trends, Study Shows
ScienceDaily (Nov. 19, 2008) — A ban on fast food advertisements in the United States could reduce the number of overweight children by as much as 18 percent, according to a new study being published this month in the Journal of Law and Economics. The study also reports that eliminating the tax deductibility associated with television advertising would result in a reduction of childhood obesity, though in smaller numbers.
The study was conducted by researchers from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) with funding from the National Institutes of Health. NBER economists Shin-Yi Chou of Lehigh University, Inas Rashad of Georgia State University, and Michael Grossman of City University of New York Graduate Center co-authored the paper, which measures the number of hours of fast food television advertising messages viewed by children on a weekly basis.
The authors found that a ban on fast food television advertisements during children's programming would reduce the number of overweight children ages 3-11 by 18 percent, while also lowering the number of overweight adolescents ages 12-18 by 14 percent. The effect is more pronounced for males than females.
Though a ban would be effective, the authors also question whether such a high degree of government involvement—and the costs of implementing such policies—is a practical option. Should the U.S. pursue that path, they would follow Sweden, Norway and Finland as the only countries to have banned commercial sponsorship of children's programs.
"We have known for some time that childhood obesity has gripped our culture, but little empirical research has been done that identifies television advertising as a possible cause," says Chou, the Frank L. Magee Distinguished Professor at Lehigh's College of Business and Economics. "Hopefully, this line of research can lead to a serious discussion about the type of policies that can curb America's obesity epidemic."
The study also found that the elimination of tax deductibility tied to advertising would similarly produce declines in childhood obesity, albeit at a smaller rate of 5-7 percent. Advertising is considered a business expense and, as such, it can be used to reduce a company's taxable income. The authors deduce that, since the corporate income tax rate is 35 percent, the elimination of the tax deductibility of food advertising costs would be equivalent to increasing the price of advertising by 54 percent.
Such an action would consequently result in the reduction of fast food advertising messages by 40 percent for children, and 33 percent for adolescents.
The study—the largest of its kind to directly tie childhood obesity to fast food advertising on American television—is based on the viewing habits of nearly 13,000 children using data from the 1979 Child-Young Adult National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, both issued by the U.S. Department of Labor.
A 2006 report issued by the Institute of Medicine indicated there is compelling evidence linking food advertising on television and increased childhood obesity. "Some members of the committee that wrote the report recommended congressional regulation of television food advertisements aimed at children, but the report also said that the final link that would definitively prove that children had become fatter by watching food commercials aimed at them cannot be made," says Grossman.
"Our study provides evidence of that link," he says.
The Centers for Disease Control estimate that, between 1970 and 1999, the percentage of overweight children ages 6-11 more than tripled to 13 percent. Adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 also saw a significant increase, reaching 14 percent.
Research indicates that there is an 80 percent chance an overweight adolescent will be an obese adult and that over 300,000 deaths can be attributed to obesity and weight in the United States every year.
I think this article is so true. I mean if they start watching fast food commercials when they are young, and it continues when they are adolescents then i think they do have a higher change of being obese.. and i'm sure that the parents watching these commercials with their children also have the need to eat fast food as well and their eating habits will most likely reflect on their children's eating habits.
ReplyDeletevery accurate statement influence plays a huge role in what you eat.
Deletepeople tend to come to the conclusion that if everyone is having a "whopper" then its ok to have one to.
I totally agree with Emily. What young kids and adolescents watch on television as they are growing up is a lot of what they base their life style on. Children are very visually inclined, kind of like "Out of sight, out of mind." but the other way around. If kids, and their parents for that matter, are being bombarded by fast food commercials, that is what they will want and that's probably what they are going to get. And isn't it ironic that this obesity article is all about watching TV when the kids could be getting exercise?
ReplyDeletei do agree that children are influenced greatly by what they see on tv, but an even bigger influence are the parents and the morals and values the use in the home. and lets not forget, monkey see monkey do, if the parents aren't fast food eaters, the kids are most likely to not eat fast food.
DeleteLorin T
ReplyDeleteI think this article has really good points. The fast food industry has a good idea in playing commericals during childrens programs is a great way to get business. and the commericals never stop, so the kids that grew up with tv are always going to see thoes ads and always want to eat there. I think by banning fast food tv ads would definatly decrease the obesity problem.But banning one person from advertising isnt fair if others can so i dont think it is really possible to do this.
Kim Collings
ReplyDeleteFast food commercials are a bit over the top, and kids are attracted to this kind of advertising. They see a commercial for McDonald's and immediately think they want food from there. This then brings up the "Nag Factor" which is why parents give in and buy the food for their kids. Parents don't want to listen to their kids nag them to go get fast food all day so eventually they give in and take them to McDonald's. If the parents could control this, I think it would solve a lot of problems because they are the only way for kids to get to fast food and pay for fast food. Just because there are ads for food doesn't mean the kids have to eat it.
What do you think would happen if fast food TV advertising was banned? Would there be a significant difference in obesity rates? Or do you think the parents would still take their kids to fast food chains? Interesting I tell you...
ReplyDeleteroman v
DeleteI think that if fast food ads were banned from TV that the gov would have to ban all food commercials. What is the real difference between a burger from a company like McDonalds and a company like Applebees?! Sure one is more readilly available and less expensive, but in the end arent they essentially the same food? I think that parents would still take their kids to get treats and food from fast food places.
Even,
DeleteI think if fast food TV advertisment were banned, we would still have obesity in our socirty today because parents take there kid's to buy them treats or food before they have to be somewhere real quick. I think we will always have a problem with obesity because we all love to eat and we eat over paportions that are not good for our health.
Kaitlyn Carlson
DeleteI think if they banned fast food TV adds that it would not change a thing about obesity. Parents would still take there children out for fast food.
I agree with Roman I don't think it could happen because it would be unfair to fast food restaurants. In the end fast food is food just like all the other restaurants. But if it did happen I do think the rates would drop a little. Not a ton because places like McDonalds and Wendy's are already so well known that people will go there no matter what forever.
DeleteRobert K.
DeleteLets say that hypothetically it could work and did happen. I believe that there would be a change. Not immediately, we are all still used to doing the things we do and the lack of commercials wouldn't change that a ton in the big picture. But after a while of us being out of the know, and generations that grow up without them, eventually people will be less aware, or at least less affected, by fast food. Plus think about it; why would corporations spend millions on advertisement if it didn't work?
I think if fast food was banned from Tv is would reverse not only childhood obesity but adult obesity but it would cost a lot of people there jobs best most of the people that work and go to college work at fast food restaurant and they will get layed off due to low income to the business.
ReplyDeleteI agree, but what if the fast food companies simply made their food more healthy? That would solve it all right?
Deletei think that is an even better idea healthy food would help and it might not solve it because junk food will still be in the house holds and all fast food companies might not agree with you and I.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletefast food is fast food for a reason, We are the ones responsible for fast food, if you want healthier fast food then you have to figure out a way to make it last longer for the travel times from the factory to the store and shelf time = preservatives to keep the food from spoiling faster. now to make it cheaper so that the company turn a 500% profit you use cheaper quality food and add additives. low cost + larger profit margins + longer longer shelf life + preservatives + low quality food + additives + people with the need to satisfy there ID AKA immediate gratification = Fast food ! if want to a healthy meal then you have to either grow it yourself your pay the extra money.
DeleteAbout reading articles about food and fast foods being banned. I was in Los Angeles and there government stepped in and said that everyone needs to be fit and try and eat at least healthy. What would happen if the President of the US stepped in about obesity? How would people respond to that would they be upset and go against it?
ReplyDeleteKaitlyn Carlson
DeleteI think if the president were to step in and try to help the obesity problem in America that nothing would really change. People will always do what they do and eat out and not be active. The president can encourage being fit all he wants but people are not going to go along with it.
I don't think that having more governmental control is a good idea. People should be free to make the choices they want and if they chose to eat unhealthy foods, it's at least their own choice. Governmental control seems bad to me...
DeleteI think its great the government wanted to put a stop to obesity and being unhealthy in LA, if only they could do that other places and force it not make it an option. It will only be better for the people. But i think if the president did decide to do that, many people would overreact and say it is their decision. However, they are not doing much about it themselves so i think it would be a great idea. If more options and weight loss programs were available to them then it could work. Obesity is just as bad as smoking and tobacco products, and the government has stepped in with that so why not?
Delete@emily because a government that is everything to everyone is a government that runs out of money. I would't want my access to fast food restricted just because some fat McFatties are fat.
DeleteVery interesting, Bri. While I think people would definitely become more aware of fast food obesity, I think it would result in a negative response from the American people. I think they would be upset and/or possibly rebel. People should not have to have the government(president)address this problem, but rather work it out themselves.
ReplyDeleteEvan, very true. Look at it right now us Americans in the US are in the high percentage rate of obesity. right now the government (president) is already not involved and look at our percentage rates they are still going up with obesity...i feel like they should step in and give us a little push towards on eating healthy and working out, but either way we will still get those Americans that want to do nothing besides eat and sit on the couch hahaha
DeleteCurious do guys struggle with the tv commercials about food advertisement? I will admit that I extremely do, all the food they advertise looks so yummy to me. I love to eat to food, but it is so hard for me to watch what I eat and how much I consume. Do any of you struggle? Especially with working out on top of school and work is pretty stressful...do you guys still manage to find time to work out? With me I feel like I could do better, but I at least try to manage it out where I eat right and work out and consume just enough that i feel just right. Tell me what you think?
ReplyDeleteKaitlyn Carlson
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone think that all the blame is to be put on either the fast food advertisers or the parents or both?
Carly Lloyd
DeleteI think most of the blame is on the parents. The food advertisers can't force the child to eat their product. It's the parents decision if they are going to buy it for their kids or not.
thank you kaitlin Carlson, and i feel it is the parents to blame.
DeleteThe fast food industry markets to children because the children will market to the parents. Parents have a finite resource of energy and time; sometimes the quick and easy (and unhealthy) argument wins. It's up to fast food companies to raise the quality of their products.
DeleteAndrew
kaitlyn Carlson
ReplyDeleteI think that if we had fast food commercials or not that the obesity problem in america would still be here. I dont think that it is the advertisers fault at all, it all depends on the person and if they decide they whether they go out to eat or not.
roman v
Deleteso you are just going to disreagard the research on the subject that the people put into it and say that if we banned fast food ads that their data is wrong?
Of course if the advertisements were banned it would cut the obesity rates a little, but not alot. People eat fast food because they like the way it tastes, it's cheap, and it's fast. The fact that it is unhealthy is just one of the negatives that you have to put up with. In my opinion the rates would drop but not alot. If they want to cut obesity rates there's better ways to do it. Do you guys think there are better ways to cut the obesity rates?
ReplyDeleteKaitlyn Carlson
DeleteI think that there is a better way to lower the obesity problem with children. I personally think it all begins with the child and the parent, i think children are getting lazier and the best way to lower the obeisty is to encourage excercise. Many kids dont like excercise but the parents could start active lifestyles for their children from a young age and i think that that can help the obesity problem.
I agree with you here Kaitlyn. However I feel like the problem doesn't necessarily fall on the children but rather the parents. I have a hard time believing that children of today's generation are genetically lazier than those of the past. I would argue that they are lazier because parents have gotten lazier and when they want their kid to shut up they park them in front of a T.V. and buy themselves 2 hours of quiet time because they didn't want to take them outside or something. Am I alone on the thought that the responsibility here falls on the parents? Are kids actually lazier now-days compared to before genetically or is it simply because the parents of today's generation have become lazier?
DeleteKaitln Carlson
ReplyDeleteI think that no matter what obeisty is still going to be a problem no matter what. T.V. ads or not people will continue eating unhealthy and contiue to not exercise, so the obeisity rate will continue to rise. I dont think its right to put the blame for people's obeisity on fast food T.V. ads, for their own problems. Does anyone aggre ?
I don't think obesity has much to do with media at all, that's just an easy thing to blame for being fat. If I sat in front of the TV eating ice cream and potato chips all day I guess I could blame espn for making me fat because they show something that keeps me interested and makes me want to sit there longer, but the truth is, that would just be a sorry cop-out for being lazy and getting fat.
ReplyDeleteDoes anybody else feel like obesity has more to do with personal mindsets than it does with anything else? I just think that obese people seem to have more excuses for getting fat than they have reasons for getting in shape, hence the obesity. Maybe I'm wrong, it just seems that way to me. Any thoughts on that or am I just being way too critical?
ReplyDeleteI think you're spot on, Tim. There must be psychological issues with people who are obese. I bet obese people feel trapped and are so used to living that lifestyle that it is hard to break away and get in shape. The mind can be a complex thing!
ReplyDeleteCarly Lloyd
ReplyDeleteDoes anybody think that if there we more commercials advertising healthy eating and a healthy lifestyle and less food ads that it would help the obesity rate?
It definitely will in most audiences that are looking "to lose weight" is the most common goal for Americans especially used as a new year resolution
Deleteroman v
ReplyDeletedoes anyone else agree that it is not the governments role to ban fast food from being advertised on the television? If they can ban what food is shown on tv then when does their power stop?
well do you think that if the world was more healthy it will be happier and less stressful?
DeleteModeration in fast food advertisement can help reduce the rate of obesity. Less influence would encourage people to eat a home cooked meal
ReplyDeleteplain and simple!! everyone has their own choice to choose what they eat when they eat and how they eat, when looking at it from a business side, if i was marketing a product and a whole community decided to speak out about my company because they disapproved of their kids eating the food i sell, then i say take the argument right back to the home and the parents responsible for not educating their kids about fast food and the health problems that come from it. if you want to hurt the person trying to make a living from advertising his business, then shame on you, maybe i should petition to have people tested to see if they are smart enough to have kids. as childish as that sounds, it is just as childish and arrogant to make a business stop advertising just because their kids are getting fat from the food they eat!
ReplyDelete